I will show you the steps I walked and let you decide. 

I looked up Paleo-Hebrew Language, I located this language: 

I don’t know about you, but that does NOT look like a Parent language of anything even remotely resembling Hebrew. That “W” is an Omega in Greek. There is an Alpha, a Delta, and a Theta… An Omicron… I can go on… this looks like an early parent to Ancient Greek. 

So… my journey continued… I came upon the “oldest example of Paleo-Hebrew Writing” and found Sinai 361, which is an allegedly “map.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sinai_361.jpg

This is the Map: 

I had my 17-year old daughter look at it and she said, “It looks like a 5 year old drew that.”

That “map” is NOT Science. First of all, those letters didn’t even exist back then. So I looked up the Original and found this: 

https://earlysemitic.weebly.com/sinai-360–361.html

This passage contains the translation: “This pit, together with this melt-furnace, is beloved of Ba`alat”.

And below is the text so you can read it yourself.

“The combination ShHh produces a word known in Hebrew and Aramaic, meaning ‘pit’ or ‘ditch’, from the root sh-w-hh, ‘sink down’. This presumably refers to the mine in each case: 361 was at the entrance of Mine N, and 360 would relate to Mine K (though it was found 150 metres from the mine).

The next word ‘t could be: ‘you’ (‘thou’); ‘a sign’ (even meaning a letter of the alphabet); ‘he came’; or ‘together with’. If we can allow Dh (dhu) to function as a demonstrative adjective, giving ‘this pit’, rather than as a pronoun, saying ‘this (is) a pit’, then we get this result:

“This pit, together with this melt-furnace, is beloved of Ba`alat”.
Or going further: “This pit and this melt-furnace are together beloved of Ba`alat”.

So I wanted to see the Abstract that details this “Map” and I found this Abstract.

The_Exodus_Inscriptions_at_Serabit_el_Kh

Why does this matter? Because this “Map” is the “evidence” that professionals present as “proof” of Moses’ written work and existence.

And here is the Abstract where they claim this: 

The_Exodus_Inscriptions_at_Serabit_el_Kh

In comparison… look at this one –> https://earlysemitic.weebly.com/sinai-360–361.html

You read it. You decide.

That is the “Evidence” that they use as Pre-Roman Era evidence that Moses and other writings exist. 

And this is one of the best pieces of “evidence” I found. What I did find was disagreement, bias, and arguing among professionals, which is the first sign that Logic and Math are not present.

Here is another example of one professional pointing out the logical fallacy of another professional. –> https://ancienthebrewgrammar.wordpress.com/2019/03/07/the-alphabet-was-not-invented-by-the-hebrews/

I will let you decide how credible the evidence is.

So until I found *actual* hard-core evidence that *actually* resembles a non-bias assessment, I will not be posting it in this timeline. 

The *only* uncontested evidence of any written Hebrew Language — aside from the Dead Sea Scrolls of the 1st Century BCE — dates back only as late as the 5th Century BCE.